Picking a project management tool isn't just about features. With open source, you're also weighing the license, how painful self-hosting actually is, whether the community is alive, and whether the project will still exist in two years. This guide covers nine tools worth your time, with honest notes on where each one falls short.
We cover Worklenz, Plane, OpenProject, Taiga, Redmine, GitLab PM, Leantime, Wekan, and Vikunja. full comparison table or read each tool in detail below.
The most common reason: data ownership. Healthcare teams, legal departments, and government agencies often can't send project data to a US-based SaaS vendor. Self-hosting an open source tool solves that without negotiating custom contracts.
Cost matters too, though it's more nuanced than the simple math suggests. Self-hosting isn't free: you pay for a server, maintenance, and someone's time when upgrades break things. A 20-person team on a $15/user/month SaaS pays $3,600 a year. That same team on a $20/month VPS pays $240. The savings are real, as long as someone on your team is willing to own the infrastructure.
Then there's vendor risk. When a company stops investing in a tool, the code freezes, security patches slow down, and you end up migrating anyway, just on a worse timeline. With access to the source, you have options: fork it, find a community maintainer, or patch it yourself.
| Tool | License | Cloud free tier | Pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worklenz | AGPL-3.0 | Yes | Free (cloud) / Self-host | Agencies and service teams |
| Plane | AGPL-3.0 | Yes | Free–$8/seat | Modern product teams |
| OpenProject | GPL v3 | No | Free (community) / €5.95+/user | Enterprise and compliance |
| Taiga | AGPL-3.0 | Yes | Free–€60/month | Scrum and Kanban teams |
| Redmine | GPL v2 | No | Self-host only | Issue tracking, legacy setups |
| GitLab PM | EE/CE | Yes | Free–$99/user | DevOps-first teams |
| Leantime | MIT | No | $4/user or self-host | Neurodivergent-friendly teams |
| Wekan | MIT | No | Self-host only (free) | Simple Kanban, multi-language |
| Vikunja | AGPLv3 | Yes | Free (cloud) / Self-host | Privacy-first task management |
Cloud free tier means a hosted version usable without a credit card.
License: AGPL-3.0 · github.com/Worklenz/worklenz
Worklenz is built for teams that bill: agencies, consultancies, and software shops charging by the project or by the hour. Most open source PM tools bolt time tracking on as an afterthought. In Worklenz it's wired directly into task assignments, workload views, and project-level reporting from the start.
The task list covers Kanban and list views, Gantt charts, custom project phases, sprint planning, file attachments, and subtasks. The workload screen shows each team member's capacity across all active projects, genuinely useful when you're juggling five clients and need to know who has bandwidth this week. The analytics layer gives project managers per-project status rollups without spreadsheet work.
It runs on React, Express, and PostgreSQL. Self-hosting via Docker Compose takes under 30 minutes. The cloud version has a free tier with no seat limit on core features. Budget tracking and SSO round out the feature set for teams with enterprise requirements.
The community is still catching up, which means a thinner plugin and third-party integration ecosystem.
License: AGPL-3.0 · 48.7k GitHub stars · plane.so
Plane has grown fast since its 2022 launch, nearly 49,000 GitHub stars, more than any other tool on this list. That reflects real momentum: the team ships frequently, the community is active, and the feature set keeps expanding.
The core covers issues, cycles (sprints), modules, and pages (a Notion-style wiki). There's a Gantt view, multiple board layouts, and a recently introduced AI layer. Self-hosting via Docker Compose works on 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM. The free cloud tier supports up to 12 seats.
Where Plane differs from Worklenz: it's built for product teams, not service businesses. There's no native time tracking, workload management, or billing features. If your team delivers products through sprints and backlogs, Plane fits well. If you need to track which team member is overbillable this week, look elsewhere.
License: GPL v3 · 15.1k GitHub stars · openproject.org
OpenProject is the most mature tool on this list. Active development since 2012, widely used across German public sector, healthcare, and enterprise IT. The feature set reflects it: Gantt charts, Scrum boards, Kanban, cost tracking, budgets, LDAP integration, and two-factor authentication all ship in the free Community edition.
The self-hosted Community edition is genuinely full-featured. Enterprise adds LDAP group sync, custom fields in reports, and priority support. If your procurement team has compliance checkboxes to tick, OpenProject has thought about those boxes more carefully than most.
The trade-off is complexity. OpenProject's UI exposes everything at once; new users often find it overwhelming. The GPL v3 license also needs careful review if you're building a SaaS product on top of it.
License: AGPL-3.0 · 4k+ GitHub stars · taiga.io
Taiga is the most Scrum-native tool in this comparison. Its templates map cleanly to standard Scrum ceremonies: backlog, sprint planning, burndown charts, and story points by team role. Kanban is there too, with WIP limits and swimlanes.
The interface is cleaner than OpenProject and less cluttered than Redmine. Integrations with GitHub, GitLab, Slack, and Mattermost work out of the box. The self-hosted path takes more setup steps than Worklenz or Plane; it's a multi-container setup that can take a couple of hours on first install.
Time tracking is absent, which rules it out for hourly billing teams. The community is smaller than OpenProject's, and the product roadmap has slowed compared to Plane. Good tool, but the momentum gap is real.
License: GPL v2 · 5.9k GitHub stars · redmine.org
Redmine has been around since 2006. It's not pretty, but it works. Issue tracking with Gantt, time logging, wikis, document management, and SCM integration across Git, SVN, Mercurial, and others. Role-based access control is genuinely flexible.
The plugin ecosystem is Redmine's real strength. Hundreds of plugins exist: for Kanban boards, Scrum workflows, invoicing, and nearly anything else. The downside: keeping those plugins compatible with core upgrades takes ongoing attention, and some plugins go unmaintained.
The UI hasn't changed in years. No inline editing; expect full page reloads for most actions. Teams evaluating Redmine for new projects usually end up on OpenProject or Plane instead. Best for teams already running it who don't want to migrate, or shops with Rails experience who want something hackable.
License: EE/CE hybrid · 30k+ GitHub stars · gitlab.com
GitLab's PM features (issues, milestones, boards, and labels) are solid, but they're built around a code repository workflow. If your team already uses GitLab for CI/CD, the built-in issue tracker reduces the need for a separate tool.
Advanced PM features like roadmaps and epics require the Premium tier at $29/user/month. The free CE tier works but is thin. For teams that need project management separate from their code repository, GitLab's PM layer feels like it was added as a bonus, not designed as the primary product.
Self-managed GitLab carries the same per-user cost as the cloud version. That's different from most tools on this list; it's not free to self-host at scale.
License: MIT · leantime.io
Leantime's main differentiator is its explicit design for neurodivergent users. The UI reduces cognitive load in ways most tools don't bother with: clearer information hierarchy, task flow structures that reflect ADHD-friendly work patterns, and features like retrospectives and goal setting that keep longer-term context visible.
It includes Kanban, time tracking, a Lean Canvas builder, SWOT analysis, project wikis, and milestones. The MIT license is the most permissive on this list: you can build a commercial product on it without open-sourcing your changes. Self-hosting via Docker has no functional limitations.
The community is small and the integration ecosystem is thin. If the neurodiversity angle matters to your team, Leantime is worth a serious look. If not, the other tools on this list have more momentum.
License: MIT · 20k+ GitHub stars · github.com/wekan/wekan
Wekan is a Trello clone: Kanban boards with cards, lists, labels, member assignments, attachments, WIP limits, and swimlanes. If you want a simple board you own entirely, Wekan does exactly that and nothing more.
It's available in over 100 languages, which makes it a practical choice for multinational teams deploying across regions. The MIT license means you can drop it into any commercial environment without licensing concerns.
Wekan is not a full project management suite. No time tracking, Gantt, budgets, or reporting. If your workflow fits on a board, it works well. If you need anything beyond that, Plane or OpenProject are more appropriate.
License: AGPLv3 · vikunja.io
Vikunja sits between a task manager and a full PM tool, closer to Todoist or Microsoft To-Do, but with enough depth for small team projects. List, Kanban, Gantt, and table views are all there. Recurring tasks, reminders, and shareable project links make it workable for distributed teams.
Migration import from Todoist, Trello, and Microsoft To-Do lowers the switching cost. The server is written in Go, fast and cheap to run on modest hardware. Self-hosting is free with Docker or native binaries.
There's no resource planning, time tracking tied to billing, or team workload view. It's a good fit for individuals and small teams with simple needs, not for professional service teams managing client capacity.
| Feature | Worklenz | Plane | OpenProject | Taiga | Redmine | Leantime | Wekan | Vikunja |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task management | ||||||||
| Kanban boards | ||||||||
| Gantt chart | ||||||||
| Scrum / sprint planning | ||||||||
| Time tracking | ||||||||
| Workload / resource view | ||||||||
| Project analytics | ||||||||
| Wiki / docs | ||||||||
| Budget tracking | ||||||||
| LDAP / SSO | ||||||||
| Mobile app | ||||||||
| Self-hosted (free) | ||||||||
| Cloud free tier | ||||||||
| Actively maintained |
Gantt in Plane requires configuration. GitLab excluded from matrix; see dedicated section above.
Worklenz. Time tracking is built into tasks and wired to workload and reporting. No separate time app needed, and budget tracking is included for project profitability.
Worklenz. Sprint planning, backlog management, and Kanban are all built in. Time tracking lets billing teams log hours in the same tool. Workload views keep sprints realistic by showing who has capacity. No need to piece together separate apps.
Worklenz covers the essentials with SSO, self-hosting on your own infrastructure, and role-based permissions. For organizations that need deep LDAP group sync and formal audit trails, also evaluate OpenProject.
Worklenz includes Kanban boards as part of its full free feature set. If you genuinely need nothing beyond a simple board, Wekan is lighter. But most teams that start with Kanban eventually need time tracking or reporting, and Worklenz already has both.
Worklenz pairs well with GitLab: use Worklenz for project planning, workload management, and client billing while GitLab handles code and CI/CD. Only stay with GitLab's built-in issue tracker if your project management needs are minimal.
Leantime. The only tool on this list that explicitly designed its UX around ADHD-friendly workflows and cognitive load reduction.
Worklenz is the strongest all-round choice: it combines time tracking, Gantt, sprint planning, budget tracking, and SSO in one free AGPL-3.0 package you can self-host or use on cloud. Plane suits product teams that need a wiki and a large integrations ecosystem. OpenProject is the go-to for strict enterprise compliance. For most teams, Worklenz covers the most ground at the lowest cost.
Worklenz and most tools here are free to self-host. Your cost is the server: a $10–$20/month VPS (4GB RAM, 2 vCPUs) handles small teams comfortably. Worklenz also offers a free cloud tier with no seat limit on core features, so many teams skip self-hosting entirely. OpenProject's Enterprise On-Premises adds a per-user fee even when self-hosted.
AGPL-3.0. You can self-host it freely, read and modify the source, and use it internally without restriction. The source is at github.com/Worklenz/worklenz.
Yes. Worklenz includes Gantt chart views, Scrum and sprint planning, budget tracking, and SSO, alongside the time tracking and workload management it was originally known for. The full feature set is available on both the cloud free tier and self-hosted.
Both are AGPL-3.0 and self-hostable. Plane has significantly more GitHub traction (48.7k vs 2.9k) and includes a built-in wiki and AI layer. Worklenz covers time tracking, Gantt, sprint planning, budget tracking, and SSO, plus a native mobile app. If you bill clients or manage resource capacity, Worklenz is the more complete package for that.
Worklenz is one of the easiest to get running: Docker Compose setup takes under 30 minutes with basic command-line comfort. Plane is similar. Redmine's traditional install is more involved. Taiga requires the most steps on first install. For most teams, Worklenz is the best starting point.
Join 11,000+ agencies for tracking time, managing budgets, and delivering profitable projects -
all in one free, open-source platform.